<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Running Thoughts]]></title><description><![CDATA[Perspectives on early-stage startups, founder psychology, and the operational edge.]]></description><link>https://www.samnadams.com</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:05:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.samnadams.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[Sam N. Adams]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[samuelnadams@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[samuelnadams@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[Samuel N. Adams]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[Samuel N. Adams]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[samuelnadams@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[samuelnadams@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[Samuel N. Adams]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[The Spectrum of VC Support]]></title><description><![CDATA[The founder-VC relationship is a kind of marriage. So why do so many firms treat support like a quarterly check-in?]]></description><link>https://www.samnadams.com/p/the-spectrum-of-vc-support</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.samnadams.com/p/the-spectrum-of-vc-support</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel N. Adams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 21:55:47 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!ssoO!,w_256,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffce2b91a-2a3a-484c-a92e-8e87376a13d0_3735x3735.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of early-stage VCs talk about &#8220;support,&#8221; but what that means in practice spans a massive spectrum. On one end: the update-only crowd. Quarterly emails, passive board seats, maybe a reflexive LinkedIn like. On the other: real partners who show up in the hard moments, think alongside you, and put their own calendar equity on the line.</p><p>Most founders don&#8217;t realize how wide that gap is until after the wire hits.</p><p>When I launched dot.LA, we built a cross-firm cap table that gave me a front-row seat to how different VCs actually operate after the wire transfer cleared. It was typically a smaller-than-usual check size for the investor, but I got a unique lens on who really showed up. Some just wanted quarterly updates, which were often ghosted. Others made a point of proactively reaching out and offering ideas and support whenever possible.</p><p>Now, two years into the investor seat myself, I&#8217;ve also seen that spectrum from the inside. And what I&#8217;ve learned is that real support looks less like a dashboard review and more like this:</p><ul><li><p>Structured, recurring convos that aren&#8217;t just about &#8220;how it&#8217;s going,&#8221; but about where to step in</p></li><li><p>Hands-on help with recruiting, GTM planning, and downstream fundraising that is systematized but bespoke</p></li><li><p>A portfolio community where founders solve problems faster because they&#8217;re not solving them alone</p></li><li><p>Systems that scale this support without diluting it: async tools, modular platforms, on-demand experts</p></li></ul><p>And at the core, there&#8217;s a mindset: this is a relationship. It&#8217;s not &#8220;call me if you need me.&#8221; It&#8217;s &#8220;I&#8217;m already here.&#8221;</p><p>If you&#8217;re a founder picking a lead, don&#8217;t just ask who they&#8217;ve backed; ask how they show up.</p><p>If you&#8217;re a VC, ask whether you&#8217;re the kind of partner you&#8217;d want in your own corner.</p><p>That&#8217;s been my north star on the other side of the table: be the VC I wish I&#8217;d had &#8212; the one I glimpsed in pieces across the best of them.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[You’re Not Ready for a VP of Sales]]></title><description><![CDATA[How to design your GTM team before and after PMF]]></description><link>https://www.samnadams.com/p/youre-not-ready-for-a-vp-of-sales</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.samnadams.com/p/youre-not-ready-for-a-vp-of-sales</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel N. Adams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:13:18 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!ssoO!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffce2b91a-2a3a-484c-a92e-8e87376a13d0_3735x3735.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month <a href="https://www.samnadams.com/p/pmf-you-know-it-when-you-see-it">I wrote about Product-Market Fit</a>: how you can&#8217;t always define it, but you know it when you see it. This one&#8217;s about what to do before you get there.</p><p>If you&#8217;re still pre-PMF, your go-to-market motion should look simple: the founder sells. Not because you&#8217;re the best closer, but because no one else can extract the signal you need. Every sales call is a product conversation. Every objection is a roadmap. If you&#8217;re not close to the buyer, you&#8217;re not close to the problem.</p><p>That doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;re flying solo. One of the most useful early hires is a gritty, curious BDR: someone who can run outbound, fill the funnel, and get you in the room. But if you&#8217;re still figuring out your ICP, testing segments, or sharpening the pitch, you shouldn&#8217;t be handing off the conversation. You need those reps yourself.</p><p>The sequencing I recommend looks like this:</p><p>&#8594; <strong>First: Founder-Led Sales.</strong></p><p>Run the calls. Track conversion. Sharpen your narrative.</p><p>&#8594; <strong>Then: Outbound BDR.</strong></p><p>Once you&#8217;ve got a rough playbook, bring someone in to build lists, test scripts, and learn what&#8217;s working.</p><p>&#8594; <strong>Only Later: Account Execs.</strong></p><p>When you&#8217;re swamped with qualified leads and your calendar is full, bring in a closer to help scale.</p><p>&#8594; <strong>Eventually: Sales Leadership.</strong></p><p>A VP makes sense once you&#8217;re past $1&#8211;2M ARR and need to manage a team, but usually not before.</p><p>The mistake I see over and over is hiring too early. Senior salespeople are expensive, but more importantly, they&#8217;re not wired for this stage. They expect structure. They want process. And if you don&#8217;t have real signal yet, they&#8217;ll either stall out or, worse, start chasing the wrong leads.</p><p>Founder-led sales is about earning clarity, so that when you <em>do</em> hire, you&#8217;re handing over a system, not a mess.</p><p>I&#8217;ve seen this sequence work firsthand across multiple early-stage teams. The founders who stay closest to the buyer win faster. They don&#8217;t just close deals, they learn what they&#8217;re really selling.</p><p>If you&#8217;re figuring that out right now, keep going. The next hire can wait.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[PMF: You Know It When You See It]]></title><description><![CDATA[On defining product-market fit, and knowing when you&#8217;re close.]]></description><link>https://www.samnadams.com/p/pmf-you-know-it-when-you-see-it</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.samnadams.com/p/pmf-you-know-it-when-you-see-it</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel N. Adams]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 20:44:21 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!ssoO!,w_256,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffce2b91a-2a3a-484c-a92e-8e87376a13d0_3735x3735.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A founder asked me recently how to know when they&#8217;ve found product-market fit. It&#8217;s a question I hear a lot, and while there are all kinds of frameworks out there, the most useful one I can offer is borrowed from Justice Potter Stewart, who was trying to define obscenity: &#8220;I know it when I see it.&#8221;</p><p>It&#8217;s not a cop-out. It&#8217;s a reflection of how slippery PMF can be in practice, and how founders often try to codify something that&#8217;s more diagnostic than definitional.</p><ul><li><p>There are patterns, though. When you&#8217;re close to product-market fit:</p></li><li><p>You don&#8217;t need to brute-force the top of the funnel with mass outbound.</p></li><li><p>Sales cycles compress, feedback loops tighten.</p></li><li><p>Buyer personas stop needing nudges and start championing internally, because the solution actually solves something real.</p></li></ul><p>Instead of dragging leads over the line, you find yourself catching up to inbound. The questions change from &#8220;why do we need this?&#8221; to &#8220;why didn&#8217;t someone build this sooner?&#8221;</p><p>Or as Marc Andreessen put it: &#8220;The market pulls the product out of your hands.&#8221;</p><p>That&#8217;s the moment I most enjoy with companies: when they&#8217;re right on the cusp. Some traction, yes, but still messy enough that support actually matters.</p><p>Most of the founders I back are solving real problems. Pain pills, not vitamins. They&#8217;re building for customers who really, actually need the product, not just admire it conceptually. And when that&#8217;s true, the signals are there if you know what to look for. You&#8217;ll see usage patterns that defy your initial assumptions. You&#8217;ll lose a deal and still get a thank-you note. You&#8217;ll wake up to a calendar full of prospects who found you.</p><p>But getting to that point requires discipline. I&#8217;ve seen companies stall for quarters because they couldn&#8217;t stop selling the version of the pitch they wanted to be true, rather than the one the market was reacting to. The best founders I&#8217;ve worked with treat GTM as a discovery process. They adjust the frame until it snaps into place.</p><p>That doesn&#8217;t mean chasing every shiny logo, especially if that prospect would require some large custom build-out that isn&#8217;t universally applicable. It means having enough clarity to recognize what&#8217;s working, and enough conviction to focus there, and iterating until you feel the subtle infection point.</p><p>So if you&#8217;re wondering whether you&#8217;ve found product-market fit, ask yourself this:</p><ul><li><p>Are prospects repeating your value prop back to you in their own words?</p></li><li><p>Are you closing faster than before, without steep discounts or heroics?</p></li><li><p>Are users showing up without needing to be reminded?</p></li><li><p>Are you hearing &#8220;this is exactly what we needed&#8221; more than &#8220;we&#8217;ll think about it&#8221;?</p></li></ul><p>Want a metric? Sean Ellis&#8217;s 40% test is a good one: if you survey your users and 40%+ say they&#8217;d be &#8216;very disappointed&#8217; if the product disappeared, you&#8217;re probably in the zone.</p><p>It&#8217;s not scientific. It&#8217;s not even linear. But when it clicks, it clicks. That&#8217;s the moment to double down: lock the narrative, focus the roadmap, and pull the team into alignment. Don&#8217;t chase every shiny use case. Don&#8217;t overhire. Just feed what&#8217;s already working, and clear everything else out of the way.</p><p>I&#8217;ve seen that moment up close, with teams solving real problems for customers who can&#8217;t wait. It&#8217;s what I look for now when meeting early-stage founders. You can&#8217;t fake it. But if you&#8217;re close, you can usually feel it.</p><p>And like Justice Stewart said: you know it when you see it.</p><div class="subscription-widget-wrap-editor" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.samnadams.com/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe&quot;,&quot;language&quot;:&quot;en&quot;}" data-component-name="SubscribeWidgetToDOM"><div class="subscription-widget show-subscribe"><div class="preamble"><p class="cta-caption"><strong>Thanks for reading! Subscribe for future essays, straight to your inbox.</strong></p></div><form class="subscription-widget-subscribe"><input type="email" class="email-input" name="email" placeholder="Type your email&#8230;" tabindex="-1"><input type="submit" class="button primary" value="Subscribe"><div class="fake-input-wrapper"><div class="fake-input"></div><div class="fake-button"></div></div></form></div></div><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>